Editorial and corrections policy

Material claims should identify the implementation setting, stage, available source, human-control boundary, limitation, and what remains unmeasured or not publicly reported. Intended benefits must not be presented as observed outcomes.

RealWorldAI.ai is part of the Good Samaritan Institute ecosystem. The site should distinguish full case studies from ecosystem overviews and should not imply independent validation, certification, or endorsement where none has been documented.

A human publisher remains responsible for source selection, claims, context, and corrections. AI assistance, when used in editorial work, does not replace source verification or accountable review.

Correction requests should identify the page, disputed statement, and supporting source. Do not include sensitive or restricted records in an initial request.

Substantive accepted corrections should be reflected in the page and, where the context warrants it, accompanied by a dated correction note. Minor spelling or formatting fixes may be made without a public note.